0.13/0.14	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.13/0.15	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.14/0.36	% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
0.14/0.36	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.14/0.36	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.14/0.36	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.14/0.36	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.14/0.36	% CPULimit   : 960
0.14/0.36	% WCLimit    : 120
0.14/0.36	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 04:18:35 EDT 2022
0.14/0.36	% CPUTime    : 
0.22/0.51	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.22/0.51	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.22/0.51	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.22/0.52	# partial match(1): HSMSSMSSMLSNHSN
0.22/0.52	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMMLSNHSN.
0.22/0.52	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.22/0.52	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 600s (5) cores
0.22/0.52	# Starting post_as_ho3 with 120s (1) cores
0.22/0.52	# Starting post_as_ho11 with 120s (1) cores
0.22/0.52	# Starting full_lambda_8 with 120s (1) cores
0.22/0.52	# post_as_ho11 with pid 29221 completed with status 0
0.22/0.52	# Result found by post_as_ho11
0.22/0.52	# partial match(1): HSMSSMSSMLSNHSN
0.22/0.52	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMMLSNHSN.
0.22/0.52	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.22/0.52	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 600s (5) cores
0.22/0.52	# Starting post_as_ho3 with 120s (1) cores
0.22/0.52	# Starting post_as_ho11 with 120s (1) cores
0.22/0.52	# No SInE strategy applied
0.22/0.52	# Search class: HHHNS-FFSF00-SHSSMFNN
0.22/0.52	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.22/0.52	# Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores
0.22/0.52	# new_ho_10 with pid 29223 completed with status 0
0.22/0.52	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.22/0.52	# partial match(1): HSMSSMSSMLSNHSN
0.22/0.52	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSMMLSNHSN.
0.22/0.52	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.22/0.52	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 600s (5) cores
0.22/0.52	# Starting post_as_ho3 with 120s (1) cores
0.22/0.52	# Starting post_as_ho11 with 120s (1) cores
0.22/0.52	# No SInE strategy applied
0.22/0.52	# Search class: HHHNS-FFSF00-SHSSMFNN
0.22/0.52	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.22/0.52	# Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores
0.22/0.52	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.22/0.52	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.22/0.52	
0.22/0.52	# Proof found!
0.22/0.52	# SZS status Theorem
0.22/0.52	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_22, type, mrel: mindex > mworld > mworld > $o).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_23, type, '#b_u': mindex).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_24, type, '#b_s': mindex).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_25, type, mactual: mworld).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_26, type, mlocal: (mworld > $o) > $o).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_27, type, mnot: (mworld > $o) > mworld > $o).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_28, type, mand: (mworld > $o) > (mworld > $o) > mworld > $o).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_29, type, mor: (mworld > $o) > (mworld > $o) > mworld > $o).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_30, type, mimplies: (mworld > $o) > (mworld > $o) > mworld > $o).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_31, type, mequiv: (mworld > $o) > (mworld > $o) > mworld > $o).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_32, type, mbox: mindex > (mworld > $o) > mworld > $o).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_33, type, mdia: mindex > (mworld > $o) > mworld > $o).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_34, type, seventy: $i).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_35, type, ninetyfive: $i).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_36, type, second: $i).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_37, type, paris: $i).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_38, type, first: $i).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_39, type, price: $i > mworld > $o).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_40, type, dest: $i > mworld > $o).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_41, type, class: $i > mworld > $o).
0.22/0.52	thf(decl_42, type, esk1_0: mworld).
0.22/0.52	thf(mlocal_def, axiom, ((mlocal)=(^[X1:mworld > $o]:((X1 @ mactual)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mlocal_def)).
0.22/0.52	thf(mand_def, axiom, ((mand)=(^[X2:mworld > $o, X4:mworld > $o, X3:mworld]:(((X2 @ X3)&(X4 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mand_def)).
0.22/0.52	thf(mimplies_def, axiom, ((mimplies)=(^[X2:mworld > $o, X4:mworld > $o, X3:mworld]:(((X2 @ X3)=>(X4 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mimplies_def)).
0.22/0.52	thf(mbox_def, axiom, ((mbox)=(^[X5:mindex, X1:mworld > $o, X3:mworld]:(![X6:mworld]:(((mrel @ X5 @ X3 @ X6)=>(X1 @ X6)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mbox_def)).
0.22/0.52	thf(axiom_2, axiom, (mlocal @ (mbox @ '#b_s' @ (mimplies @ (mand @ (dest @ paris) @ (class @ second)) @ (price @ seventy)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_2)).
0.22/0.52	thf(axiom_5, axiom, (mlocal @ (mbox @ '#b_s' @ (mand @ (dest @ paris) @ (class @ second)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', axiom_5)).
0.22/0.52	thf(con, conjecture, (mlocal @ (mbox @ '#b_s' @ (price @ seventy))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', con)).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_7, plain, ((mlocal)=(^[Z0:mworld > $o]:((Z0 @ mactual)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mlocal_def])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_8, plain, ((mand)=(^[Z0:mworld > $o, Z1:mworld > $o, Z2:mworld]:(((Z0 @ Z2)&(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mand_def])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_9, plain, ((mimplies)=(^[Z0:mworld > $o, Z1:mworld > $o, Z2:mworld]:(((Z0 @ Z2)=>(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimplies_def])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_10, plain, ((mbox)=(^[Z0:mindex, Z1:mworld > $o, Z2:mworld]:(![X6:mworld]:(((mrel @ Z0 @ Z2 @ X6)=>(Z1 @ X6)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox_def])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X20:mworld]:(((mrel @ '#b_s' @ mactual @ X20)=>(((dest @ paris @ X20)&(class @ second @ X20))=>(price @ seventy @ X20)))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[axiom_2, c_0_7]), c_0_8]), c_0_9]), c_0_10])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X19:mworld]:(((mrel @ '#b_s' @ mactual @ X19)=>((dest @ paris @ X19)&(class @ second @ X19)))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[axiom_5, c_0_7]), c_0_8]), c_0_10])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X36:mworld]:((~(mrel @ '#b_s' @ mactual @ X36)|(~(dest @ paris @ X36)|~(class @ second @ X36)|(price @ seventy @ X36)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X35:mworld]:((((dest @ paris @ X35)|~(mrel @ '#b_s' @ mactual @ X35))&((class @ second @ X35)|~(mrel @ '#b_s' @ mactual @ X35)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ~(![X22:mworld]:(((mrel @ '#b_s' @ mactual @ X22)=>(price @ seventy @ X22)))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con]), c_0_7]), c_0_10])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X3:mworld]:(((price @ seventy @ X3)|~((mrel @ '#b_s' @ mactual @ X3))|~((dest @ paris @ X3))|~((class @ second @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X3:mworld]:(((class @ second @ X3)|~((mrel @ '#b_s' @ mactual @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_18, plain, ![X3:mworld]:(((dest @ paris @ X3)|~((mrel @ '#b_s' @ mactual @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ((mrel @ '#b_s' @ mactual @ esk1_0)&~(price @ seventy @ esk1_0)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X3:mworld]:(((price @ seventy @ X3)|~((mrel @ '#b_s' @ mactual @ X3)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17]), c_0_18])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (mrel @ '#b_s' @ mactual @ esk1_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ~((price @ seventy @ esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])).
0.22/0.52	thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21]), c_0_22]), ['proof']).
0.22/0.52	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.22/0.52	# Parsed axioms                        : 42
0.22/0.52	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.22/0.52	# Initial clauses                      : 36
0.22/0.52	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 22
0.22/0.52	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
0.22/0.52	# Processed clauses                    : 17
0.22/0.52	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.22/0.52	# ...subsumed                          : 1
0.22/0.52	# ...remaining for further processing  : 16
0.22/0.52	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.22/0.52	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.22/0.52	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.22/0.52	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.22/0.52	# Generated clauses                    : 1
0.22/0.52	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
0.22/0.52	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.22/0.52	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
0.22/0.52	# Paramodulations                      : 1
0.22/0.52	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.22/0.52	# NegExts                              : 0
0.22/0.52	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.22/0.52	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.22/0.52	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.22/0.52	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.22/0.52	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.22/0.52	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.22/0.52	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.22/0.52	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.22/0.52	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.22/0.52	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.22/0.52	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.22/0.52	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.22/0.52	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.22/0.52	# Current number of processed clauses  : 3
0.22/0.52	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
0.22/0.52	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.22/0.52	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.22/0.52	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
0.22/0.52	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10
0.22/0.52	# ...number of literals in the above   : 23
0.22/0.52	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.22/0.52	# Current number of archived clauses   : 13
0.22/0.52	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10
0.22/0.52	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
0.22/0.52	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
0.22/0.52	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.22/0.52	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.22/0.52	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
0.22/0.52	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.22/0.52	# Condensation attempts                : 17
0.22/0.52	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.22/0.52	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 2157
0.22/0.52	
0.22/0.52	# -------------------------------------------------
0.22/0.52	# User time                : 0.005 s
0.22/0.52	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.22/0.52	# Total time               : 0.006 s
0.22/0.52	# Maximum resident set size: 1896 pages
0.22/0.52	
0.22/0.52	# -------------------------------------------------
0.22/0.52	# User time                : 0.006 s
0.22/0.52	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.22/0.52	# Total time               : 0.009 s
0.22/0.52	# Maximum resident set size: 1760 pages
0.22/0.52	EOF